Goodreads

Maddie's books

Thirteen Reasons Why
4 of 5 stars
It was a good read because I haven't read anything like it before. The story line was original and it was very interesting. It was very sad, but still enjoyable.

goodreads.com

Wednesday, December 17, 2014

The Development of Peter Houghton as a Villain (Book 4 Review)




Stage 1: Injustice
Peter was bullied from the moment he stepped on the bus for his very first day of Kindergarten and from then on it only got worse. Bullies threw his Superman lunch box out of the bus windows, broke his glasses, punched him, called him names, sent out his private emails to the whole school, and even pulled down his pants in front of the whole cafeteria.  You can see only a glimpse of the torture Peter faced when Jodi says “ and in one smooth stroke he hooked his thumbs into the loops of Peter’s pants and yanked them down to his ankles”(Picoult 321).  All of these injustices done to him caused him to want to fight back and get revenge on his bullies.  Peter says “I guess I should tell you, don’t blame yourself; this isn’t your fault, but that would be a lie.  We both know that I didn’t get here by myself” (Picoult 1).  Nobody wants to admit this, “but bad things will keep on happening.  Maybe that’s because it’s all a chain, and a long time ago someone did the first bad thing, and that led someone else to do another bad thing, and so on” (Picoult 43).  The first bad thing someone did to Peter was throw his lunch box out the window which led someone else to make fun of him until the torture became endless and led him to do something unforgettable.  When at his trial Peter was asked why he did it and he answered “They started it….The bullies.  The jocks.  The ones who called me a freak my whole life” (Picoult 424).

Stage 2: Obsession
Peter was provoked by bullies so his obsession was to get revenge on those bullies and he did.  He went to extreme methods to get revenge.  He made car bombs, loaded up on weapons, targeted his victims by circling faces in the Sterling Middle School yearbook, and then brought his weapons to school where his revenge was served.  His revenge was walking over the dead bodies that he shot and seeing the life drain out of their face.  Jodi says “In nineteen minutes, you can order a pizza and get it delivered.  You can walk a mile.  You can sew a hem.  In nineteen minutes, you can stop the world, or you can just jump off it.  In nineteen minutes, you can get revenge” (Picoult 1).
 
Stage 3:  Pride
Peter was blinded by his plan to get revenge that he didn’t realize how catastrophic it would be.  He thought he was doing the right thing for himself because he was in a dissociative state since he struggled from post-traumatic stress disorder.  No one was there to protect him or help him from the bullies which is why he felt so strongly in what he did since not a single person reached out to him.

Stage 4: Isolation
Lacy Houghton, Peter’s mom, said that Peter was always locked away in his room and always doing something on the computer when she walked in.  He resorted to the digital world since no one was paying attention to him in real life.  He created a computer game called “Hide-N-Shriek” where the nerds in school got to kill the bullies.  He realized how easy it was to win in a computer game and thought he could do the same in real life.  Peter says “when I did it in the game, I won” (Picoult 425).

Stages 5&6: Detachment and Cruelty/Wickedness
The biggest scene in the book where I realized how Peter had no remorse for what he had done or felt was when “he passed by the boy he’d shot who lay in a puddle of blood….and then he sat down at one untouched tray and placed the gun on it.  He opened a box of Rice Krispies and poured them into a Styrofoam bowl.  He added the contents of a milk container and ate all the cereal before standing up again, retrieving his pistol, and exiting the cafeteria” (Picoult 126).  That moment is so chilling because Peter obviously isn’t concerned about the disaster he just created.   Instead, he is rather calm and goes about life no differently than before he killed 10 people.


Peter had a rough and disappointing start to life.  He suffered the torture of being picked on everyday of his life which is why he resorted to such extreme methods to end it all.  His lack of remorse for what he did and his obsession with revenge is what makes him a Villain to all whose lives were changed drastically by him.

Post #10: Reading Wishlist

I just finished reading the novel Nineteen Minutes by Jodi Picoult and it was definitely my favorite book this semester.  It was almost 500 pages, but I found it easier to finish than the other books I read simply because I enjoyed it.  I think Jodi Picoult did an excellent job writing it so the next book I will read over break will be My Sister's Keeper because that is another one of her highly praised books. All the other books I wish to read by the time I leave for college are listed below as well.  I'm glad I got the chance to pick back up on reading for fun and I hope to continue it throughout the rest of my life.




























Monday, December 15, 2014

Reading Wishlist/Goodreads link

Maddie's books

Thirteen Reasons Why
4 of 5 stars
It was a good read because I haven't read anything like it before. The story line was original and it was very interesting. It was very sad, but still enjoyable.

goodreads.com

Book 2 Trailer

Book Talk Presentation

Monday, November 24, 2014

Five Reasons why Amy Elliott Dunne is a Sociopath

WARNING: Major Gone Girl Spoilers Including the Ending

Anyone who read the book Gone Girl by Gillian Flynn will have sympathy for Amy within the first 200 pages.  Her diary entries and the clues left around her house make it seem like her husband, Nick Dunne, murdered her.  The public begins to detest Nick and the police force begins to turn on him too.  However, Nick knows he is innocent and the readers begin to believe him once they see the real, devilish side of Amy.  Amy Elliot Dunne is a sociopath and these shocking reasons will prove it.

1.  Amy Elliot Dunne framed her husband, Nick Dunne, for her murder.  This was the major plot twist in the book.  She did everything right to try to convince the world that he had killed her.  Here are some of the items on her checklist:

 "Item 18: Stage the living room.  Tip ottoman.  Check” (220).
“Item 22:  Cut myself “(219).
“Item 33: Get out of dodge” (220).
“Item 34: Change look. Check” (236).
 Amy framed Nick because Nick got lazy and fell out of love with her and in love with a young woman named Andie.  Most normal people would file for a divorce and let it go, but Amy couldn’t do that because she would be giving Nick what he wanted…so she framed him for murder.  That’s some pretty messed up revenge, huh?  Amy says, “So I may have gone a bit mad.  I do know that framing your husband for murder is beyond the pale of what an average woman might do.  But it’s so very necessary.  Nick must be taught a lesson” (Flynn 234).

2.  Amy created fake diary entries from 2005 to 2012 where she wrote horrible and false things about Nick to make it seem like he had something to do with her disappearance.  Amy said “One hundred and fifty-two entries total, and I don’t think I ever lose her voice.  I wrote her very carefully, Diary Amy.  She is designed to appeal to the cops, to appeal to the public should portions be released.  They have to read this diary like it’s some sort of Gothic Tragedy” (Flynn 238).


3.  Amy faked a pregnancy to get more sympathy from the public.  Amy started a fake friendship with the already pregnant, Noelle Hawthorne, so that Noelle could become attached with Amy and reveal Amy’s pregnancy once she disappears.  The pregnancy made her disappearance look like Nick killed her because he didn't want a baby.  This is where things get really weird.  Amy started this crazy idea with steps such as “A search online: how to drain your toilet for repair.  Noelle invited for lemonade.  Lots of lemonade.  Noelle peeing in my drained, unflushable toilet, each of us so terribly embarrassed!  Me, a small glass jar, the pee in my toilet going into the glass jar.  Me, the glass jar of pee hidden in my purse, a doctor’s appointment (oh, I can’t do a blood test, I have a total phobia of needles…urine test, that’ll do fine, thank you).  Me, a pregnancy on my medical record.  Me, running to Noelle with the good news” (Flynn 259).


 4.  Amy wants to return home to Nick because of the interviews she has seen of him on T.V.  She actually believes that he loves her again and that he is sorry for neglecting her.  Amy comes up with a disturbing plan that will prove that her husband is innocent and that she is innocent as well so that she can return home.  She has to make sure that no one knew she was framing her husband because she could get in heaps of trouble for that.  She plans to frame Desi, the man that came to her rescue when she was in desperate need of help after she ran away and hid from the mess she started.  She returns home beaten up and bruised, claiming that Desi kidnapped her and raped her.  When Nick asks Amy how she set Desi up she responds “I found some twine in one corner of his basement.  I used a steak knife to saw it into four pieces.  Whenever Desi wasn’t around, I’d tie the pieces as tight as I could around my wrists and ankles so they’d leave these grooves” (Flynn 388).  She did these acts of discipline so it would look like qualities of a rape victim.  It was definitely insane, but her conniving plan worked.  The police believed her and Desi died a guilty man.  Amy killed him to make it look like an act of self-defense and so that she could return home and tell her story of lies with no one to fight it.

5.  Amy is a sociopath just in the fact that she pulled this whole act off.  She left no trace of evidence in what she had done.  Nick says “She fool proofed everything.  It’s ludicrous, her story, but no more ludicrous than our story.  Amy’s basically exploiting the sociopath’s most reliable maxim…The bigger the lie, the more they believe it” (Flynn 390).  Amy had been planning these insane events for a year and they were so over the top and constantly on her mind that she committed to the role and started to believe her husband was the bad guy, not her. 

How to spot a Sociopath according to Psychology Today:

*     Superficial charm and intelligence
*     Absence of delusions and other signs of irrational thinking
*     Absence of nervousness or neurotic manifestations
*     Untruthfulness and insincerity
*     Lack of remorse and shame
*     Specific Loss of insight

Amy follows the above descriptions without hesitation which is why she is a sociopath.  Her conniving mind and horrific actions make up the whole plot line of the book which is why her sociopath tendencies are allowed and accepted in this novel—crazy people and their actions make for a thrilling novel.



Thursday, November 20, 2014

Blog Post #5


I think a book has to be partially true to be considered non-fiction.  As long as the book that the author considers “non-fiction” is a good read, I would say it’s acceptable to have a few false details in there.  There is no way to tell if the author is making the story up or not, so you might as well just enjoy it.  When I try to recall certain small facts like “What did I wear on Tuesday?” I have a hard time remembering so I’m sure writers can’t remember those tiny details to include in their story.  I’m ok with writers changing the facts a little if it doesn't upset anyone.  Writers have to embellish the story a little to make it more interesting to read otherwise it’s just a bunch of facts being listed and most people don’t like reading history text books for fun.  However, I do think it is immoral when an author writes a non-fiction book about serious events such as the holocaust or 9/11 and lies about it because it’s wrong to lie about events that hurt so many people and the people actually know the truth of the matter so they can tell what the author lied about.  I think we do need lines between genres so we know what is true and what is made up, but there’s no way to do that because authors can completely make up a story and say it’s true and there is really no way to prove them wrong.  Most people don’t have the time to research authors and find all the facts to show that they made up every aspect of a book they wrote.  As long as a book that is claimed to be non-fiction is a fascinating story and doesn’t disrespect tragic events, than its ok to add extra detail in the book that isn't true.